LOLA
ÁLVAREZ BRAVO
By Raquel Tibol
In en
Ser y ver / Mujeres en las artes visuales, Plaza y Janés
Ed., México, 2002.
[ Translated by Georganne Weller-Ford ]
Young intellectuals
sensitized by feminism at the beginning of the eighties in the
20th century launched a campaign to redeem some feminine figures.
One of these figures was the excellent photographer Lola Álvarez
Bravo (1907-1993).
 |
| Modelo
Boss,
© Lola Álvarez Bravo |
Thanks to
her vivacity and vitality, Lola was then living through her
fourth or fifth stage of youth. Her enthusiasm was such that
some of these intellectuals thought they were the first to praise
her work, a cultural activist whose presence on the Mexican
scene was not continuous over seven decades, but her young friends
had forgotten that she had presented a collection of one hundred
portraits of prominent Mexicans at the Palace of Fine Arts in
Mexico City in 1965, all of which had meticulously been selected
by Lola herself, with her sharp sense of self-criticism. In
spite of this, these young intellectuals claimed that the National
Institute of Fine Arts (INBA) had not shown sufficient or frequent
enough interest in her to allow her vast work to be exhibited
in greater depth.
As a testimony to the happy encounter of Lola with this group
of young people, we have the book Lola Álvarez Bravo:
A Photographic Recounting (Ed. Penélope, 1982, Colección
Arte-Fotografía), which included new and old texts, even
one written by Luis Cardoza y Aragón, to introduce the
one hundred portraits exhibited in 1965. For the new texts the
technique used by Herbert Read in his monography on a much-admired
friend, the sculptress Barbara Hepworth, was employed: make
the protagonist speak. In these cases the interlocutor depends
on the richness and variety of the story. Judging by the highlights
of Lola’s confessions, one might suspect that listeners
were tempted by memories which referred to a fun Bohemian experience
among cordial friends, and didn’t insist enough on recognizing
the knowledge Lola achieved by continuously exercising her vocation,
although there were exceptions.
In the talk captured by Manuel Fernández Perera in “Photography,
an Internal Pleasure”, Lola sustained that she had searched
for her motives, themes and takes, but not excessively so. She
compared her work to a painter’s work, who when making
a sketch can eliminate, add, or modify it to that of a photographer,
and said, “Photography doesn’t allow you to erase,
you have to repeat”, a truth which has marked a fundamental
difference in the mode of production. She also pointed out that
similarities exist with other artistic practices. “Sometimes
good results please me and other times they scare me”,
and I say, “Well, after this what am I going to do?”
 |
| Psiquiatra
Popular, © Lola Álvarez Bravo |
On the one
hand Lola pointed to the camera’s terrible indiscretion,
and on the other, the fact that what is captured by the photographer
as raw material should be elaborated on in the take. Lola Álvarez
Bravo used a revealing term: frolicking. It was with delight
that she insisted that “There’s always some frolicking,
irony, play.”
“Frolicking, rapture and pranks make you discover.”
Mexican misery has been captured and continues to be recorded
by many photographers (painters, sculptors and etchers as well)
as something picturesque, but Lola goes beyond this decadent
outlook:
There is widespread confusion about this type of photographs
with a third world approach, or where one appears to take delight
in misery. I hope to work with it in such a way that it isn’t
offensive, but also to show a state of affairs. In any case,
photographs of misery will serve to awaken good and bad consciousness
and therefore neither quick sympathy nor simple congeniality
should be allowed.
Her analysis of Tina Modotti, her mentor in a way, was accurate:
She
was (her eyes) made for abstract plastics, and in her ideological
trajectory she changed her abstract techniques and emotions
and turned them into rich expressions full of aesthetics to
serve her in her battles and for her ideology. In Mexico Tina
matured as a fighter and channeled her work along these lines.
It wasn’t a simple art of struggle, but a true art,
as deep as her struggle was wholesome.
The Photographic
Recounting contains an excellent selection of 119 photographs:
landscapes, portraits, important personalities, situations
and photographic studies. We continuously find affection and
a fondness for human beings: children, women, men, celebrities,
and even monstrosities observed with tenderness, a tenderness
that never degenerated into sugar-coating or false sentimentality
which, as she herself warns us, was always avoided.
 |
| Soñando,
© Lola Álvarez Bravo |
The first
chapter, an autobiography, was written by Luis Zapata. In
this chapter we see a clear and convincing trace of Lola’s
rebelliousness against the traditional role of women. She
paid dearly for this, but earned the right to speak and shout
out with her own will and own voice. The second autobiographic
chapter was written by José Joaquín Blanco.
In this chapter we find a passage on her married and professional
life with Manuel Álvarez Bravo (1925-1934).
Manuel
wouldn’t let me take many pictures. He had me as an
assistant. When we were developing the pictures I would always
say “Let me do it”, and he would answer “No,
just move them around”, and then I would insist again
with “At least let me develop mine”, but he would
respond “No, just move them, dip them.”
One of
her best friends was another “liberated” woman,
María Izquierdo, with whom she lived after her break
with Manuel Álvarez Bravo. There were many reasons
for identifying with María, which Lola has clearly
stated:
At
that time, in the mid-thirties, those of us who worked as
women were able to achieve something, and people respected
us at work for our efforts, but there weren’t many of
us. This wasn’t because you had to be especially brave
to work, since there was no persecution against women, even
though we did raise a few eyebrows, but rather because you
really had to want to work.
It is
unfortunate that the interviewers didn’t get more information
from Lola and her opinion regarding Emilio Amero, a lithographer,
photographer and theoretician, and once the art director of
the magazine Futuro, who was a well-versed and talented man.
Lola narrated that she, Amero and the painter Julio Castellanos
were the founders of the first movie club in Mexico City,
which at the beginning was in the auditorium of the University
of San Ildefonso and later in a modest hall at the League
of Revolutionary Writers and Artists, but she did not reflect
these avant-garde moves in her photography.
There was no lack of audience for the stories about drunkards
personified by renown artists and intellectuals. Luis Cardoza
y Aragón, a constant participant at gatherings in Maria
Izquierdo’s house, was particularly humorous.
There
Luis Cardoza would get drunk beyond recognition on many occasions
and in front of everybody would put drinking glasses in his
pockets and then when he was about to go, leave them one by
one, completely drunk, on each stair step. Luis was very lively
and excitable, a hopeless party animal, and got himself involved
in adventures with the ladies time after time and was on the
verge of dying at the hands of Othello.
 |
| Contando
Estrellas,
© Lola Álvarez Bravo |
A Photographic
Recount was rounded out with some old texts. In addition to
a fine text on photographic portraits by Cardoza y Aragón,
there are paragraphs by Andrés Henestrosa, Alejandro
Gómez Arias and Antonio Peláez. The book ends
with three texts by her admirers Carlos Monsiváis,
José Joaquín Blanco and Manuel Fernández
Perera. The common denominator in all of these texts can be
synthesized by Gómez Arias’ paragraphs.
I
thought it was surprising that a woman so involved in the
fascinating life of a turbulent Mexico at that time could
be so inflexibly rigorous and austerely disciplined in her
professional life. Or maybe that wasn’t so contradictory…
passionately Mexican, her works (with no folkloric touches)
include personalities, anonymous people, striking women and
humble beauties, landscapes and earthy examples, her people.
These are historic documents, with no retouching or deceptions,
but never cold or inhumane. There was a certain real life
to them and a subtle, veiled and discreet poetry about them.
In other words, she used her full technical command as a precision
instrument, the means by which one could create language capable
of expressing answers to the questions changing times presented.
This solid knowledge and an extraordinary sensitiveness produced
not only quality, but also a naked modernity of creations
and, of course, the presence of a personality not to be confused
with any other – it could only be Lola.
One of
the examples of Lola Álvarez Bravo’s human touch
is her monologue on solitude:
Solitude
prolongs your life tremendously. If I live alone, I have plenty
of time to think, to make decisions, to solve everything in
my life, to be my own company. In this way you are better
prepared, you can better appreciate and enjoy being with others,
you have more room for thinking and rethinking then when you’re
always surrounded by people. You have time to pass profound
judgment about yourself, of thinking whether you think right
or not, or if you don’t think, if you feel well, or
if you don’t feel at all. You begin to form a cult around
your solitude and you see it as an empire that you have formed
around yourself, one in which you let the people you care
about in and when you don’t want anybody to come in,
you shut the door and that’s it.
Who
does the Negative Belong to?
Lola Álvarez
Bravo went through life sprightly. She preferred frolicking
at work to being intriguing in her free time. She didn’t
have very many enemies and highly valued friendships, but
her widespread kindness would immediately disappear if she
felt her author’s rights were being stepped on. In this
field and in others, she was a forerunner in Mexico.
 |
| La
Espina,
© Lola Álvarez Bravo |
Author’s
rights for photographers turned into a concern in Mexico in
1977, when the Mexican Council of Photography was founded.
Before that authors had to defend themselves as best they
could or according to intuition. From the very beginning of
her professional career Lola Álvarez Bravo felt that
the eye of the photographer placed on the materials meant
they were his property, no matter who might have acquired
them in their virgin state. According to her the plate or
film only took on a given value when the eye of the photographer
turned them into unique negatives which, once printed, would
yield a documentary service or the ensuing aesthetics. From
here stemmed an unalienable right according to her.
The first of several shocks stemming from this personal interpretation
of author’s rights came about in 1941 from within the
Institute of Aesthetic Investigations at the National University,
founded in 1936, after having absorbed the Art Laboratory
established in 1935. The first director of the Institute,
named by the rector of the university, Chico Goerne, was the
poet Rafael López, and the deputy director for a brief
period was the young lawyer Alejandro Gómez Arias.
By broadening the scope of responsibilities and the budget
as well, the decision was made to include a photographer on
the staff, who was to be given a salary and materials. The
choice was Lola Álvarez Bravo, who started off with
a simple task: to photograph the Florentine Codices, and another
very complicated one: to record with the greatest detail possible
the choir stalls of the ancient Church of Saint Agustin, or
what remained of the church. These stalls had been installed
in 1933 in the assembly hall of the National Preparatory School,
which was known to the students as “The Little General”
(El Generalito). The choir stalls were made of walnut between
1701 and 1702 by a team from Ocampo, whose members had passed
an examination to prove their abilities to represent dressed
or nude human figures, animals, foliage, fruits, etc. The
cost of the work was 240 thousand pesos. Originally the stalls
had covered three walls of the upper choir section of the
convent church, where many friars, novices and lay brothers
had been seated. In 1861 the church was dismantled with the
enforcement of the Juárez laws and the stalls were
stored in a warehouse.
 |
| Rosario
Castellanos,
© Lola Álvarez Bravo |
Some eighteen
pieces were lent to the National Museum in 1885 and three
years later were given to the National Preparatory School,
but it wasn’t until 1933 that the decision was made
to place in the “Little General’s Room”
what remained of this magnificent collection, which by now
was incomplete from being transferred so many times. As a
action of artistic redemption it was decided to document these
stalls through photography and Alejandro Gómez Arias
charged Lola Álvarez Bravo with this task, pointing
out that she had to make a test run with the seats of honor,
canopies, high and low reliefs, seals, scrolls, marine shells,
apples, monsters, caryatids in shields and atlantes with a
nude torso, exalting the unnatural profusion that had served
to represent biblical passages from Genesis and Revelations.
In the autobiographical evocations authored by Manuel Fernández
Perera, Lola remembered the difficulties of that task:
The
job in the “Generalito” was an odyssey. I had
to improvise all the trappings to be able to work - put one
table on top of the other, and a chair on top of both of them.
It was just awful, because there wasn’t enough furniture
for me to climb up on to reach the average height of the planks.
I used everything in sight to set up my platform and do the
job, and then the reflectors left me looking like a piece
of burnt caramel candy. It was a very hard job, but I managed
to do it.
In effect,
her photographs were excellent and when in 1941 the Institute
of Aesthetic Investigations decided to publish Choir Stalls
in the Old Church of Saint Agustín, a study by Rafael
García Granados, in two volumes with a total of 69
illustrations, the photographic material which had to go with
it was undoubtedly Lola Álvarez Bravo’s. In the
prologue we see that “almost all of the photographs
that appear in this monography” had been taken by her,
but it also stated that “Unfortunately the negatives
are not in the archives of the Institute, but in the hands
of the artist”. These words show the defeat of Manuel
Toussaint, the Institute’s director at that time and
who, on March 20, 1939, had written a letter to Lola informing
her that her job as photographer was to end and that she should
return the negatives and photographic material in her possession.
Among the negatives were eight extremely valuable codices
she had been asked to reproduce in 1938: Savornani was attributed
to Hernán Cortés, Haklyt to Alonso de Santa
Cruz, and there was also the one produced by Gómez
de Trasmonte in 1628, Martín de Mayorga’s from
1782, and Alzate’s, the iconographer from Revillagigedo,
Almonte’s guide and Alonso de Santa Cruz’ book
Islario.
 |
| Sin
título,
© Lola Álvarez Bravo |
Complaints
came and went, but Lola was firm in her principle that any
negative she worked on was hers. In this light all the negatives
she worked on during her tenure as photographer in the Department
of Publicity at the Ministry of Public Education and the National
Institute of Fine Arts, were hers. For example on June 9,
1949, she gave to Fernando Gamboa, the director of the Department
of Plastic Arts at INBA the inventory from the workshop, complete
with photographic apparatus, tools, lamps, liquids, absolutely
everything except the negatives, so that the official archives
were to be enriched under the government of Adolfo López
Mateos, when the Presidency acquired 2,544 8 x 10.5, 5 x 7
and 4 x 5 inch negatives, which reproduced a good part of
19th and 20th century art in Mexico, including David Alfaro
Siqueiros, Ramón Alva de la Canal, Abraham Ángel,
Ignacio Aguirre, Raúl Anguiano, Adolfo Best Maugard,
Juan Cordero, Olga Costa, Miguel Covarrubias, Jean Charlot,
José Chávez Morado, Amado de la Cueva, Jesús
Guerrero Galván, Francisco Gutiérrez, María
Izquierdo, Frida Kahlo, Agustín Lazo, Fernando Leal,
Gabriel Fernández Ledesma, Ricardo Martínez,
Carlos Mérida, Roberto Montenegro, Nefero, Juan O’Gorman,
Pablo O’Higgins, José Clemente Orozco, Carlos
Orozco Romero, Trinidad Osorio, Máximo Pacheco, Feliciano
Peña, Antonio Pujol, Fermín S. Revueltas, Diego
Rivera, Manuel Rodríguez Lozano, Julio Ruelas, Antonio
Ruiz, Federico Silva, Juan Soriano, Rufino Tamayo, Tebo, José
María Velasco, Roberto Berdecio, Alfredo Zalce, Germán
Cueto, Lorenzo Rafael, Mardonio Magaña, Carlos Dublán,
Ignacio Asúnsolo, and other anonymous artists. In 1976
this extremely valuable collection of works was handed over
to the National Institute of Fine Arts. It constituted a long
history of Mexican art in images made with perseverance and
with the peculiar opportunity of having the privilege of registering
them. In this regard she told Helen Krauze (newspaper Novedades,
April 17, 1962): “My life has been alongside famous
intellectuals and their works and this has provided me with
an education, to have the ideas that I hold and to be who
I am, if I am somebody.”
And she told Manuel Fernández Perera that:
I
believe that most of my achievements can be attributed to
an education in plastics. If I hadn’t followed the works
of painters so closely and studied so much when reproducing
the sense of composition and balance in their paintings and
murals, perhaps I would have taken much longer with my photographs.
The study of plastic arts was very helpful to me and gave
me a more complete and precise idea of the huge importance
of light, composition and volume. The fact that I was so familiar
with paintings greatly helped me in my efforts to compose.
 |
| Pita
Amor,
© Lola Álvarez Bravo |
Landscapist
and Promoter
If someone were to hear Lola Álvarez Bravo say “I
hardly work with landscaping, since it doesn’t take
into account our senses, and given that I always do what I
like, it is unusual for me to get into photographing landscapes,
because I know I am going to err, because I can’t get
into it as a photographer”, should not believe her.
Images such as Erongarícuaro (ca., 1945), Cielo, mar
y tierra (1950), Palenque, Tula, Duna (taken around 1950)
are enough to situate her as a broad scope, sensitive and
a crack landscapist in her perception of terms and tones.
But, in addition to her historic consciousness of what this
artistic genre means in culture, particularly in Mexican culture,
she openly expressed this idea at the inauguration of the
Contemporary Art Gallery, with the exhibit El paisaje de México
en la plástica y en la poesía, organized in
collaboration with the supplement published by the newspaper
Novedades, México en la Cultura.
Painters, writers and poets formed a large family when I began
to understand, together with them, Mexico’s art and
beauty. I heard the poet gloss over in forms and in color
the landscaping of the land, and the painter, moved, to comment
on this in poetry. Thus I saw mankind take over the sky and
the land in Chi-Chén, Uxmal, Teotihuacán and
Monte Albán. I also witnessed a tragic hell in the
deserts of Baja California, Sonora, the mountain chain of
Chihuahua, and the tragic case of the Mezquital.
The scale of landscaping in Mexico is grandiose. It makes
man lose himself or turn into an insignificant polychromatic
spot, but the artist with even greater concerns does not resign
himself to disappearing in the midst of this indifferent veracity.
The artist, always struggling, fights to achieve his grandeur
and to be able to express himself on the same scale, only
later to project, by reflex, his emotions once again toward
mankind (Novedades, August 22, 1954).
To be able to launch an art gallery in 1951 where there used
to be a photographic study on Amberes St. No. 12, in an area
which was still not known as the Pink Zone, nor was for tourists,
Lola Álvarez Bravo was helped by Raúl Abarca,
whom she had met in 1946, as a student at the Photographic
Workshop that she headed at the National School of Plastic
Arts. Before, in an informal and sporadic manner, she used
to present the works of some close friends. Regular activities
here, which in a revamped gallery for this express purpose,
began in October, 1951, and by 1952 the gallery presented
a sample of José Clemente Orozco’s gouaches and
drawings (February 15 – March 1).
 |
| Frida
Kahlo, © Lola Álvarez Bravo |
His prestige
was consolidated with the first anniversary of the supplement
México en la cultura, part of the Novedades newspaper,
with the noteworthy collection of De Carnavales a Judas en
la plástica de México (March – April,
1952), after many discussions on what was Mexican, held by
a group of intellectuals composed of Samuel Ramos, Silvio
Zavala, José Gómez Robledo, Francisco de la
Maza, Jesús Montejano, Henrique González Casanova,
José Moreno Villa, Juan José Arreola, Leopoldo
Zea, Emilio Uranga, Justino Fernández, Manuel Romero
de Terreros, Fernando Salmerón, Pablo González
Casanova and others. The exhibit organized by Lola was echoed
and was a testimony to this polemic situation of historic
transcendence. Lola was pleased by the growing prestige of
her gallery and prepared a much-talked about closing session.
For her successful showing on April 12, Holy Saturday, on
the corner of Amberes and Reforma, she offered the burning
of Judas.
From April 13–27, 1953, the most important exhibit of
the whole seven and a half years the Gallery of Contemporary
Art existed, was held in honor of Frida Kahlo, a project conceived
by Lola a year before, according to Adrián Villagómez.
During the same interview Lola expressed her opinion regarding
some feminine personalities that were on the front page:
Lupe
Marín is the earth of Mexico; Adela Formoso, a wonderful
organizer; Dolores del Río, a well-traveled social
star; María Asúnsolo, friendly and kind; María
Izquierdo, a great artist for the colorfulness and Mexican
naivety in her paintings were all present, but, Frida Kahlo
was considered to be the most perfect artist with the circle
of painters (Novedades, May 4, 1952).
Her admiration
for Frida led her to carry out one of the most suggestive
series of portraits. Lola’s kind camera made Frida act
to the hilt and express her spirituality. The images attest
to a poetic encounter between two friends. Another beloved
model that Lola appreciated was the painter, engraver, and
missionary teacher Isabel Villaseñor (1909-1953) who,
just like her and María Izquierdo, had been born in
Jalisco. Chabela, her nickname, was discovered in movies by
Sergei M. Eisenstein, who gave her the role of María
in the “Maguey” episode in the movie ¡Qué
viva México! in 1931.
 |
| Sin
título,
© Lola Álvarez Bravo |
In 1941,
in Chachalacas, Veracruz, Lola Álvarez Bravo painted
Chabela’s beautiful body, drapped in a loose white nightshirt,
her long dark hair flowing behind her, her mestizo face turned
upwards, together with the trunk of a tree and a palisade,
in the photograph El ensueño, a soft erotic metaphor
of a young woman possessed by light. Also noteworthy is the
portrait she painted in 1947, which was reproduced in catalogue
45 Autorretratos de pintores mexicanos, siglos XVIII al XX,
and presented at the Palace of Fine Arts.
On the first anniversary of the premature death of Chabela
Villaseñor, in March of 1954, the Gallery of Contemporary
Art presented an exhibit in her honor, commented on, among
others, by Pablo Fernández Márquez:
In
Lola Álvarez Bravo’s gallery, an exceptional
woman for many reasons, many important events devoted to the
work of women artists have been held. We will always remember
with great emotion that solemn moment not too long ago when
Frida Kahlo entered the gallery on Amberes St. on a stretcher,
only to receive one of the most affectionate and intimate
tributes that anyone could ever receive from her personal
friends and art supporters. The act on the 15th of March of
the same year, in the same gallery, was in many ways similar
to this one, but was different in the fact that the heroine
was absent. At a posthumous tribute with physical absence,
the work and spirit of the artistic woman of exquisite sensitivity
were present, seducing people with the same grace and same
charm to which they were attracted during her lifetime. (Newspaper
El Nacional, March 28, 1954).
Together
with Chabela’s gouaches, monotypes, etchings and paintings,
Lola brought together portraits done by her of her friends,
as well as by Manuel Álvarez Bravo, Alfredo Zalce,
Angelina Beloff, Raúl Anguiano, Juan Soriano, Gabriel
Fernández Ledesma and others. Lola demonstrated once
again that the Gallery of Contemporary Art knew how to honor
friendship.
 |
| Sin
paisaje pero quitecito,
© Lola Álvarez Bravo |
A
Sad Farewell
Lola was not an intimate friend of Tina Modotti, but rather
it was Manuel Álvarez Bravo who was her true friend
from 1927 on. Lola was the beloved wife of the friend, the
woman who had the human quality of drawing closer to the other
woman when she knew that the other woman in February, 1930,
was about to be deported, and that in 48 hours she had to
sell some of her simple belongings to face both an uncertain
and a somewhat threatening future. It was then when Lola bought
from Tina her Graflex camera that had once belonged to Edward
Weston, plus another 8 x 10 one that would be useful to her
in her studio. A few years later the Graflex was to become
an ef€cient instrument for work out on the street, after her
marriage of almost ten years fell apart, when Lola found in
photography a way of earning a living, both materially as
well as spiritually. From Tina’s letters that Lola kept,
written after Tina was ousted from Mexico in February, 1930,
written aboard the ship Edam and from Berlin, it was confirmed
that the real friend was Manuel and Lola was the wife of the
friend. This is why it is particularly interesting to read
feminine literature on the episode of Tina’s farewell
at the train station as told by Lola to Christiane Barckhausen-Canale,
Tina’s biographer:
Manuel
Álvarez Bravo is firm, to date, in that he was the
only person who went with Tina to the railroad station; however,
Lola is unable to explain her husband’s poor memory.
“I remember that all three of us – he, our small
son and I – all went with her. It’s impossible
that he has forgotten that Tina, at the door of the railroad
car, touched my boy’s head and told him that she was
sure some day of seeing a better Mexico, a country in improved
conditions. I, at least, will never forget that scene.”
With a
straightforward attitude, holding no grudge when stating this,
Lola defended her life, she was not willing to be deprived
of her experiences, but she hadn’t assumed an advocate’s
attitude either, she was only brought up that extra-personal
attitude and profoundly allegoric moment with her son, when
an unfortunate woman fondly deposited in him her sad hopes
for the future. This same touch of gentleness filtered through
Lola Álvarez Bravo’s works and deeds.
 |
| El
ensueño,
© Lola Álvarez Bravo |
Lola Álvarez
Bravo, Select Photographs, 1934-1985 was her best individual
exhibit, and was shown in the now extinct Contemporary Art
Cultural Center between October, 1992 and January, 1993. Her
last work was associated with this Center and dealt with the
new edition in press in June, 1993. It was a dream of Acapulco,
a book initially published in 1951, with eighty photographs
of hers and texts written by Francisco Tario, J.M. López,
and Carlos Mérida. For this second edition Lola had
the help of the director of the photographic archives at that
time in this Center, Victoria Blasco. The number of copies
printed was unheard of in Mexico at that time: some 20 thousand.
It was marketed as support for this magnificent photographer
in her old age, but who was to die shortly afterwards.
 |
Derechos
Reservados: Cuartoscuro® |
|